e-limbo, e-zine de informacion y analasis de modos de vida actual
 
23.06.2017 / Sesión no Iniciada 
_Actualidad

 _enviar articulo

e-mail emisor
e-mail receptor
Ayúdanos a evitar contactos automáticos
Anti Spam
Texto
 

En estos tiempos de hipercomunicación bastaría la invitación de enviar a un amigo cualquiera de los textos que consideres interesantes algo redundante: demasiada comunicación, demasiados textos y , en general, demasiado de todo.
Es posible que estemos de acuerdo... pero cuando encuentras algo interesante en cualquier sitio, la red, la calle, tu casa, o un lugar escondido y remoto, compartirlo no sólo es un acto (acción, hecho) de amistad o altruismo, también es una manera de ahorrar tiempo a los demás (y de que te lo ahorren a ti (si eres afortunado) a costa del tiempo que tu has podido derrochar (emplear) y el gustazo de mostrar que estuviste ahí (o donde fuera ) un poco antes (el tiempo ya no es más el que era).
Comparte con tus conocidos aquello que encuentras, es evolución.
The Roman Polanski Case
31-10-09 David Bruce Allen 

 

My admiration for John Dewey, pragmatist, and Ludwig von Wittgenstein, logician, rests on their absolute devotion to facts. Dewey, the pragmatist, worked back from ends; Wittgenstein, the logician-metaphysician, restricted himself to beginnings. They separated sense from nonsense, and exposed false propositions to open up space for truth and reason.


I consider myself a pragmatist, perhaps because I am not gifted enough for Wittgenstein's work. As William James astutely explained, all that pragmatism requires is the discipline to look at results of actions and be willing to step-by-step work through the intervening process. The focus is always on the facts. If my academic field, strategy, were to look for a home within philosophy, pragmatism would be its proper residence.

Now then to the Roman Polanski case, which, predictably, has become a media circus in which various interest groups have chosen to defend or criticize Mr. Polanski. The loudest voices would like us to believe that he is either a victim of life's circumstances and American injustice or he is filthy, sick pederast who should be put away forever. Each position depends on selecting a specific part of the story and spinning out a web of meaning that, in turn, rests primarily on their respective desire either to free or punish Mr. Polanski. These desires care neither for the facts of the case nor for the larger import of Mr. Polanski's actions.

In our examination of the case, we will first describe the disparate, mostly ill-conceived, reactions to Roman Polanski's arrest in Zurich September 26th. We then turn to the facts -- i.e., the legal case against Mr. Polanski in 1997. We set out, as well, the case against the American justice system. With this evidence in hand, we look at the plea bargain and the actual punishment that the accused received. Finally, we evaluate the choices made by Mr. Polanski, the extent of his responsibility for his actions and their impact on others. On this last point, Dewey is quite clear. Ethics and empirical inquiry go together. We judge behavior not based some abstract or a priori universal principle but on the effects of human conduct on others and on the future well-being of society.

The Arrest and Public Reaction

As we all know, Roman Polanski, a French citizen, was arrested in Zurich September 26th on a 32 year old U.S. warrant. Support for Polanski in France was instantaneous. The French minister of Culture and Communication, Frédéric Mitterrand, was adamant: "a film-maker of international dimension .... thrown to the lions for an old story which doesn't make much sense, imprisoned while traveling to an event that was intending to honor him: caught, in short, in a trap, is absolutely dreadful". Mitterand called Polanski "a wonderful man"; about America, he said, there is "a generous America that we love, and a certain America that frightens us. It's that America that has just shown its face." (http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1926508,00.html)

French artists were also quick to support Polanski. Le Figaro lead with "Les artistes se mobilisent pour la libération de Polanski", reporting that famous director, actors, as key institutions such as the Cinémathèque Française, le Festival de Cannes, la Société des auteurs compositeurs dramatiques (SACD), l'ARP (Auteurs, réalisateurs et producteurs)  had signed a petition calling on the Swiss to free Polanski immediately.

In the United States, Variety reported that "The French entertainment industry org Societe des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques claimed that more than 100 filmmakers, writers and thesps -- including Martin Scorsese, Michael Mann, Darren Aronofsky, Wes Anderson, Jonathan Demme, Woody Allen, David Lynch, Pedro Almodovar, Wim Wenders, Tilda Swinton and Tom Tykwer -- had signed a petition demanding that Polanski be freed."  (http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118009308.html?categoryid=3745&cs=1).

Following this initial outpouring of sympathy for Polanksi, responses have become more guarded. The Directors Guild of America, a key institution in the U.S., has refused comment, as have other U.S. institutions. And in France, public opinion has been negative.

In addition, among French filmmakers, one prominent voice has spoke out against Mr. Polanski is Luc Besson, who works frequently in the U.S. and is best-known for "The Fifth Element" and the blockbuster Transporter series and Arthur and the Invisibles. If these works were the sum total of Mr. Besson's accomplishments, he might be simply dismissed as pro-American. However, in the mid-80's, Mr. Besson was a highly-regarded "independent" "serious" writer-directo, winning Cesar Awards for "Subway" and "The Big Blue". Within the French film industry, Besson is both respected and disliked for his crossover success with French "art" films and American "mass market garbage". Besson commented:

"This is a man who I love a lot and know a little bit," Mr. Besson said in a radio interview with RTL Soir. "Our daughters are good friends. But there is one justice, and that should be the same for everyone. I will let justice happen." He added, "I don't have any opinion on this, but I have a daughter, 13 years old. And if she was violated, nothing would be the same, even 30 years later." (http://www.liberation.fr/culture/0101594034-luc-besson-la-justice-doit-etre-la-meme-pour-tour-lemonde) (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/movies/30polanski.html?hp)

Today, September 30th, four days into the crisis, the French media report that opinion on the case in France is divided. "The French intellectual elite" (not my term) support Polanski. French politicians divided between themselves with the left pro-Polanski and the right who want to go after "the pederast" (Le Pen's term, not mine). The French public, Le Figaro reports, is rather more anti than pro, stoked up by Le Pen and others of his ilk.

As is to be expected, among those with firm opinions on the case very few have actually read the legal document the case rests on. To this, we now go.

The Legal Case Against Mr. Polanski

The facts of the case (Case No: A334139, People of the State of California, Plantiff, vs. Roman Polanski, Defendant) as set out by the Los Angeles District Attorney's Office on January 6th, 2009, depict a premeditated rape of a 13 year old girl by the defendent, Roman Polanski, then 43.  You may read the case yourself. The Deputy District Attorney David Walgren's filing in response to Mr. Polanski's motion to dismiss on-line at http://docs.google.com/gview?a=v&q=cache:eLwiW0Zzv54J:hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_documents/0106polanski_motion.pdf+david+walgren+january+6+AP+motion+filed&hl=es&sig=AFQjCNEa_ldG3qY8gRPBttzClkFHB7DoBQ

Having read the case, I have little doubt that Mr. Polanski raped the victim, Samantha Greimer. Ms. Greimer, who has publically asked that the case against Mr. Polanski be dismissed, confirmed her testimony in a 2003 interview with ABC television. Mr. Polanksi has admitted that what he did was wrong, but has stuck to his story of consentual sex with a minor.

The Case Against the American Justice system

The handling of the case by the Los Angeles Police Department (L.A.P.D.) and the D.A.'s office appear to have been less than exemplary. The plea bargain between the D.A.'s office and Mr. Polanski's attorneys, recommended a 90-day psychiatric observation, after which time the defendant would be freed. However, following a 42-day psychaitric observation in Chino prison hospital, Polanski was released only to learn that Judge Lawrence Rittenband, in charge of sentencing, was planning to send Mr. Polanski to a prison term.

Not surprisingly, Mr. Polanski fled the United States. Mr. Polanski's unpleasant experience with American justice was subject of, "Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired", a HBO documentary aired in 2008.

During the three decades years that Mr. Polanski was a fugitive, the L.A. District Attorney's Office made several unsuccessful attempts to arrest him. Nonetheless, why they moved now in Zurich is unclear, though the D.A.'s Office insists that they would have acted earlier had there been the right opportunity and has provided a timeline of their efforts to detain Mr. Polanski.

In sum, it seems clear that Mr. Polanski was subject to capricious, and possibly unfair, treatment by the California criminal justice system. During these last 32 years, Mr. Polanski has sought to have the charges dismissed on several occasions.

Crime and Punishment

Mr. Polanski raped a 13 year old girl. He was never tried for that crime. Instead, via a plea bargain, he was convicted of having sex with a minor, and served 42 days in a prison psychiatric ward.

I have long opposed plea bargaining in criminal cases, as it institutionalizes dishonesty within the justice system. Like Mr. Polanski, men and women are asked to plead guilty for lesser crimes in exchange for not be charged for greater crimes; often the lesser crime is simply an invention. Without plea bargaing, Mr. Polanski would have been tried for rape and either convicted or declared innocent.

Plea bargaining became standard procedure in the U.S. during the high-crime 1960's. Considered a "necessary evil" in the U.S., plea bargaining is banned in many countries. Nonetheless, several European countries, among them France, have experimented with plea bargaining for the same reasons as U.S. -- relieve court overloading and battle organized crime. Justice, it turns out, is an expensive exercise in freedom.

And What About Mr. Polanski?

The arguments that have been made on Mr. Polanski's behalf mix the following elements:

1. 32 years have passed.

2. Mr. Polanski has suffered terribly (I will not recount the murder of Sharon Tate or Mr. Polanksi horrific childhood).

3. Judge Rittenband was using the Polanski case to make himself famous.

4. The entire case was marked by violations of due process, and there is no reason to believe that if Mr. Polanski returned to the U.S. that he would be treated fairly.

5. The victim has asked that the case be dismissed.

All these statements are true. Now we must answer the question of whether they are exculpatory.

Let us begin with the fifth reason. The charges against Mr. Polanski were brought by the "People of the State of California" not Ms. Geimer. We are, collectively, victims of any criminal act. Rape is a special and exceptional example of why this is so. Every time a girl or woman is raped, the freedom of every girl and every woman is aggrieved. Every time a girl or woman is raped, the freedom of men and women to interact without fear is diminished. The sexual act – private, intimate, vulnerable, glorious and sacred – is estranged from us and our collective humanity is thereby diminished as well. Ms.  Geimer's continued distress merits our concern and sympathy; however, insuring that rapists are properly brought to trial, prosecuted and convicted is of greater weight.

The fourth reason – due process violations – is a serious issue. There is, however, legal recourse. This legal recourse must be effective. The complaint that the U.S. legal system does not guarantee due process is a serious charge that, too often, is true. It is also true that the French, Italian, German, British, etc. suffer from serious flaws in their due process. It is debatable whether the U.S. system is worse than others in the developed world. As I argued in my opposition to plea bargaining. Justice is expensive. In a free, open, and complex society, justice will always be expensive. We all need to pay up.

The third reason, Judge Rittenband's motivations are part of the due process argument and do not require additional explanation.

Reasons one and two can be handled together.  Personal suffering is never a justification for causing harm to others. Having fled, Mr. Polanski is responsible for the time that has passed, not the California courts. Nonetheless, the elapsed time and who Mr. Polanski is today (suffering included) do affect what happens now. These questions, I would argue, are the province of the California courts and should be decided accordingly. My recommendation is that Mr. Polanski be extradited to California where the prosecution and the defense will present their respective arguments. This time, with the whole world watching, we expect due process to be awarded greater respect than it was last time.

Finally, the renewed suffering of Ms. Geimer and her family, as well as the pain felt by Mr. Polanski's wife and their two children, are the responsibility of Mr. Polanski alone. Unlike the suffering inflicted on Mr. Polanski by the psychopathology of the Nazis and the Manson sect, the pain of the Geimer family and Mr. Polanski's family are the product of Roman Polanski's will, desires, and choices. The curious title of the 2008 documentary "Roman Polanski: Wanted and Desired" was meant to refer to his being "wanted" by the law in America, and "desired" as an artistic and cultural icon in France. The sad truth is that Mr. Polanski is wanted in America because of his own desires. As is true of all men and women, Mr. Polanski is a machine for producing desires, both good and bad. We choose. Mr. Polanski chose. He made the wrong choices.

In criticizing Mr. Polanski, Mr. Besson made a choice as well. No doubt, he understood that his statement would radically change his relationship to Polanski, and the relationship between their daughters. The French film community will see Mr. Besson differently, and there will, most likely, be events at which the two men coincide. Further choices will be made. Ethical maturity, Dewey argued, is the result of reflexity about the choices we have made. It is, perhaps, not just an bizarre coincidence that in Besson's 1994 film, The Professional, that when the 12 year old heroine, played by Natalie Portman, asks a much older man to be her first lover, he politely refuses.



Coming from http://www.davidbruceallen.com/




Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
   
 

Rating: 1 - 1 voto(s).

   
_COMENTARIOS
No existen comentarios.
Comentario / Comment:
  atención: para realizar comentarios tienes que ser usuario registrado.
        

_HistÓrico_Actualidad

26-08-15_ ATAQUES Y ATAQUITOS
27-09-12_ tré calm o apercevai le (verano sound)
10-05-15_Están clavadas tres cruces
15-01-12_ ¡GAMUZA!
11-11-11_ El 15-O: más de 800 ciudades, 70 países y una fecha
06-07-11_ Nos perdimos la revolución
06-07-11_ TODOS LOS NOVIOS DE LA MUERTE
28-05-11_ Copiad, malditos!
13-03-11_ Consideraciones libres acerca del exilio * el destino final de Walter Benjamin
24-04-11_ Mentiras arriesgadas
24-01-11_ El cine después del cine
11-12-10_ Guns and Weed: The Road to Freedom
20-01-11_ Sensaa: estafadores del new media
01-01-11_ Son quince minutos. Dejas de respirar. Y fuera
11-12-10_ ERIC CANTONA llama a la revolución
01-01-11_ Lucho por el derecho a ser diferente * Youcef Nabi (AKA Sue)
01-01-11_ Flatrr, una alternativa entre derechos de autor vs. acceso libre
21-11-10_ PETER SUNDE * PIRATE BAY
05-11-10_ Maribel López... comisaria independiente
11-12-10_ Guns and Weed: The Road to Freedom
24-10-10_ Cita secreta con el hombre que hace temblar al Pentágono
24-10-10_ Aristóteles pone orden en la Batcueva
17-10-10_ Juan Ramón Yuste... un adiós más
28-07-10_ EL AMBIGÚ : THE END
18-04-10_ P2P: sentencia histórica
14-03-10_ ARCO'10: EL ARTE BURGUÉS COMO MOMENTO EFECTIVO DEL SILENCIO DEL ARTE
03-01-10_ en tránsito, transitar, transiciones
23-11-09_ El nuevo salto de Paul Auster
18-10-09_ Y por bandera, la ideología pirata
31-10-09_ The Roman Polanski Case
15-11-09_ Pop político y utopía
31-05-09_ Moving Information": On Kenneth Goldsmith's The Weather
18-05-09_ El eterno seductor
05-07-09_ Burroughs sobre Ballard (D.E.P) & (R.I.P)
10-05-09_ www.e-limbo.org  [todo se transforma]
10-05-09_ ZEMOS 98 (de un tirón... festina lente)
27-02-09_ Será cierto? Fernando Castro dice adiós? Pues no, no era cierto
25-01-09_ Babas y Valverde
11-01-09_ Cultura anuncia una medida "antipopular" inminente contra la piratería
18-12-08_ Jorge Diezma * INVITACIÓN
18-09-09_ Un ratón entre rejas
18-09-09_ La comercialización como obra de arte
24-11-08_ Aventura sexual en la América profunda
05-10-08_ Mucho arte para... ¿el fraude?
18-09-09_ esc[aping] from the desktop: bic, bic; bic, bic, bic
18-09-08_ El ministro y el funámbulo
08-09-08_ ARS ELECTRONICA premia la provocación ¿?
18-09-08_ Tinto de verano, helio y celuloide...
06-09-08_ Keren Cytter [video works]
20-07-08_ C.B. visitando a "madame" Sarkozy
02-09-08_ WONDERLAND seguido de PHONE SEX OPERATORS (2 x 1)
15-07-08_ BANKSY unmasked
25-06-08_ Sublimes y rastreros
22-07-08_ "RENDITION" no es RENDICIÓN
15-06-08_ De repente, el NAPSTER europeo
25-05-08_ Con enemigos así ... * Slavoj Zizek vs. Simon Critchley
12-05-08_ 60 años del Estado de ISRAEL
29-03-08_J.G. Ballard: Miracles of Life (Audiobook)
24-03-08_ Arthur C. Clark y el más allá aún más (DEP)
24-03-08_ Lujo y Underground
05-03-08_ Agüero tumba al Barça
17-03-08_ Pues yo me estoy follando a Ben Affleck, cariño
24-03-08_ Arte desde el laboratorio
09-02-08_ One Small Seed
09-02-08_ Ballmer's Internal E-Mail to The Troops Explaining the Yahoo Acquisition
24-03-08_ Un YOU TUBE para los intelectuales
12-01-08_ Things & Thinks
25-12-07_ Buenas prácticas, mejor cultura
09-12-07_ Frío, frío, frío...
17-01-08_ HIV/Aids: stigma's curse and cure
29-11-07_ GIVE PEACE A CHANCE VS POWER TO THE PEOPLE
06-11-07_ 2 días más allá del LIMBO: estamos de vuelta
02-11-07_ Creative Commons 2007 campaign * Next frontier: Luxembourg
06-11-07_ CENSURADOS
02-11-07_ Di adioooos a todo (y hola! a algunas sorpresas)
20-10-07_ ¡Muera el Arte! ¡Viva la Denuncia!
15-10-07_ Radiohead: La revolución, tal vez
15-10-07_ SAFE CREATIVE
04-10-07_ Apples
11-10-07_ Dylan, Lucian Freud, Glass, Duchamp... al saco
29-09-07_ PÚBLICO... ya está aquí el nuevo diario. Lo celebramos disfrutando de su licencia pública. FRANCOTIRADORAS de la CANCIÓN
24-09-07_ Con arte y nocturnidad: "por favor, comuniquen cosas: *sean* crípticos"
25-09-07_ Hunter S. Thompson Symposium Video
19-09-07_ Madrid & Valencia= católicos a la fuerza
10-10-07_ El arte de la pseudo_decepción ;-)
10-10-07_ MNACRS o el suceso sucesorio
12-09-07_ De 1984 al exhibicionismo colectivo
07-09-07_ La Justicia de la UE apoya el anonimato en las descargas...
25-08-07_ Warhol Vs. Banksy
10-08-07_ Creative Commons news & tasks
30-08-07_ Asalto a la Fundación Menéndez Pidal
16-04-08_ Z... I... Z... E... K... stop...
31-03-08_ Miami Ink * Más allá de la piel (updated 25_02_'07)
11-07-07_ 50 Free, Full Length Movies on Google Video
19-07-07_ Una arquilla de curiosidades... o no?
26-06-08_ Jim Morrison * Entrevista (1969)
05-07-07_ Rosa García-Malea se convierte en la primera mujer que pilotará un avión de combate F-18 ;-) [e-limbo*]
10-05-08_ El problema del Lenguaje * Jacques Derrida
27-06-07_ La SGAE contra la información
27-06-07_ El Instituto Cervantes de Nápoles y el IMV, condenados por plagiar una obra 'copyleft'
26-06-07_ MySpace es para perdedores
21-06-07_ Jugando a ser Dios o el falsificador de billetes
21-06-07_ ¡Chaos! (o la busqueda del amor perdido) nadie te quiere...
26-06-07_ Entrevista * Lawrence Lessig (Creative Commons)
04-06-07_INCLUSIVA-NET
31-05-07_ Máster en Artes Visuales y Multimedia
20-05-07_ Ardiendo por ambos cabos
19-05-07_ Cannes & Ian Curtis... Joy Division
12-05-07_ Verguenza eterna caiga sobre el NASTI
24-04-07_ Arte que deviene polémico... será posible
12-04-07_ Un trabajo sucio
12-04-07_ !!! en concierto (el que avisa no es traidor)
27-03-07_ Writing in the free world
22-03-07_ Brian Eno * 77 millones de pinturas...
18-03-07_ Bajo el signo del (Petro) Dólar
10-03-07_ Todo el mundo mira
09-03-07_ F is for Fake & for F**k
07-03-07_ Jean Baudrillard ha muerto
06-03-07_Ad Generator, fake ads generates by a machine
04-03-07_ El futuro cumple 25 años
02-03-07_ El orgullo del Sheriff
24-02-07_ Piano preparado y otros incidentes
18-02-07_  Dos momentos entrañables 
12-02-07_ En la oscuridad de la mina... 
09-02-07_ Interview * Takashi Matsumoto
08-06-08_ Entrevista * Paul Virilio
25-02-07_ La Red ya es transparente
01-02-07_ Noticias desde el otro lado (el obscuro?)
31-01-07_ APAGÓN * L'Alliance pour la planète.
26-01-07_ All around the wor(l)d (it's not enough)
24-01-07_ Jeff Bezos vuela alto (objetivo la luna)
23-01-07_ The Perils of high definition porn
16-01-07_ James Cameron dirige "Avatar"
04-01-07_ Great White Bear
30-12-06_ From here to Eternity (a bunch of videos ) Happy 2007
26-12-06_ Manga, la nueva cultura del Pop
22-12-06_ La Fundació AAVC decideix tancar Hangar
12-12-06_ Moviding
03-12-06_ Laurent Garnier * Entrevista
01-12-06_ Poniendo el cazo en Irak. El nacimiento del régimen más corrupto del mundo. 1ª parte
27-11-06_ My religion is kindness
14-11-06_Señor vulgaridad (Torrente en Hollywood!!)
13-11-06_ Entrevista * Manuel Borja-Villel
02-11-06_El derecho a pensar
01-11-06_Houdini: mago, escapista y... espía
26-10-06_Sophie
22-09-07_ La cámara de escribir
18-10-06_Elastico recomienda: Kosmopolis 2006
17-10-06_Delenda est Britannia
17-10-06_Como puta por rastrojos
03-10-06_Week End * Jean Luc Godard
01-10-06_Llega el catálogo de IKEA
25-09-06_Zinoku
18-09-06_Samuel Beckett * MNCARS
18-09-06_Crítica a la exposición de Federico Guzmán sin haberla visto
16-09-06_Watch the video of George Bush being assassinated
12-09-06_Alucinante [sin palabras]
08-09-06_El cerebro en estado vegetativo: UBIK ?
08-09-06_Agent Provocateur
05-09-06_Colaboracionistas
01-09-06_El top 10 de los top 10
30-08-06_Sorry Madame / Sir, su violín se queda
18-08-06_Time Waits For No One
17-08-06_Electrónica hoy
17-08-06_Swedish Pirate Party launched a new Internet service…
11-08-06_Has Steve Jobs Lost His Magic?
05-08-06_Conflux, NYc festival for psychogeography
01-08-06_Un Acorazado en La Granja
20-07-06_A Scanner Darkly (2006) yeaaaaahhhhhh
06-07-06_Desde praga con prisas
28-11-07_ Matta-Clark, el artista destructor 
26-06-06_“Intellectual Property”: why P2P is under attack
26-06-06_C.A.N.O.N.
11-06-06_¿Hay vida fuera del sónar?
08-06-06_Someter y Segregar * Entrevista con Jorge Diezma
05-06-06_'The War Tapes' Provides a Soldier's-Eye View of the Days Over There
01-06-06_Conservar el arte electrónico y digital
19-05-06_ENTREVISTA * Zygmunt Bauman * modernidad líquida
19-05-06_ENTREVISTA * Vicente Todolí * Tate Modern de Londres
11-05-06_Una mitología poderosa
07-06-06_Spread the GIF luv!
04-05-06_Bradbury deslumbra...
22-04-06_Ava Gardner, by Lee Server
22-04-06_A User's Guide to the TriBeCa Film Festival
18-04-06_Samuel Beckett siempre se escabulle
09-04-06_Beckett, el destino de las vanguardias
06-04-06_Los Blancos no son superiores
02-04-06_Robert Storr * Comisario para la Bienal de Venecia
01-04-06_The God project
24-03-06_LO ABIERTO. El hombre y el animal * Giorgio Agamben
19-03-06_Un drama nada 'giocoso' | Don Giovanni
13-03-06_Lecciones de Truman Capote
14-03-06_El increible contador menguante del Partido Popular
10-03-06_The tells you what to think tank
04-03-06_Spivak o el mundo subalterno
08-03-06_Creación digital: El arte «ilegítimo» de nuestro tiempo
27-02-06_Exercise in Psychogeography
23-02-06_The New New Madonna
19-02-06_The Benefits of Bozo
12-02-06_La « España plural » de María Corral
11-02-06_Neil Young: Heart of Gold
07-02-06_It's a kind of magic
07-02-06_Things to Come
29-01-06_Roma castiga... los Jesuitas, también.
27-01-06_American Psychoanalyst: Bernard-Henri Lévy's American Vertigo
27-01-06_What's the matter with 'Munich'?
20-01-06_And Now Iran: We can't rule out the use of military force
13-01-06_Basquiat, Scharf, Unhinged Bohemians Spray-Paint Manhattan
09-01-06_Cine de ciencia ficción
08-01-06_What Sharon Did
24-12-05_Careful Where You Put That Tree
14-12-05_To Boldly Go Where No Fan Has Gone Before
24-11-05_Una parodia del creacionismo
11-11-05_Valencia Sónica / Reminiscencias de un periplo cultural
29-10-05_La sociedad líquida
27-10-05_Degustación
23-06-05_¿Por qué la imagen de la Maldad no evoluciona?

_ORBITAL_Actualidad

_Servicios

test
Regístrate y disfruta de utilidades de administración y gestión de los contenidos de e-limbo*
Recibe las novedades en tu correo electronico.
El futuro está escrito en las estrellas... Horóscopo creado por J.G. Ballard y dedicado a todos vosotros.
Aplicaciones y herramientas necesarias para navegar y utilizar los contenidos del limbo electrónico e internet (www).
Artículos de e-limbo* en formato PDF preparados para viajar y aportar información allá donde estés. (y seguir salvando árboles)

_e-limbo * apoya

test

_Multimedia

_AUDIO >
Mais uma edição do podcast Música Livre para o Archivo Vivo, do Centro Cultural da Espanha/AECID. ...
_PODCAST >
Ante preguntas de oyentes y amigos, puedo responder ahora que Vía Límite continuará en Radio ...
_VIDEO >
SORPRESA¡!¡! An unreleased version of Talking Heads' "Psycho Killer" with Arthur Russell on cello
Optimizado: Firefox, Safari, Mozilla, Netscape, Konqueror, Explorer. Resolución óptima: 1024x768
ISSN: 1885-5229    Aviso Legal e-limbo.org*