e-limbo, e-zine de informacion y analasis de modos de vida actual
24.10.2017 / Sesión no Iniciada 

 _enviar articulo

e-mail emisor
e-mail receptor
Ayúdanos a evitar contactos automáticos
Anti Spam

En estos tiempos de hipercomunicación bastaría la invitación de enviar a un amigo cualquiera de los textos que consideres interesantes algo redundante: demasiada comunicación, demasiados textos y , en general, demasiado de todo.
Es posible que estemos de acuerdo... pero cuando encuentras algo interesante en cualquier sitio, la red, la calle, tu casa, o un lugar escondido y remoto, compartirlo no sólo es un acto (acción, hecho) de amistad o altruismo, también es una manera de ahorrar tiempo a los demás (y de que te lo ahorren a ti (si eres afortunado) a costa del tiempo que tu has podido derrochar (emplear) y el gustazo de mostrar que estuviste ahí (o donde fuera ) un poco antes (el tiempo ya no es más el que era).
Comparte con tus conocidos aquello que encuentras, es evolución.
Revolution or Resistance
28-01-07 Seleccionado por: Ana Horillo 


Speaking to a forum of left-wing activists, my friend Gaidar Dzhemal said that Islam was the banner under which the oppressed masses have resisted tyranny for over one and one half thousand years.

By Boris Kagarlitsky   


You could say this, by the way, of any of other popular religion. Unexpectedly, a comment shot out from the audience: "That's all good and well, but don't you think it's time to destroy this tyranny, instead of simply resisting it?"

During recent years, the little word "resistance" has become fashionable among anti-globalists and left-wing activists. There are few words that are uttered with such frequency at meetings, during discussions and in declarations, few words that are charged with the same kind of positive energy. Resistance is fortitude and fidelity to one's ideals. It entails the readiness to fight against anything, regardless of the asymmetry of power and the struggle's obvious futility in the eyes of the man in the street. The logic of resistance is existential. I'm not going to figure out the odds. I'm just insisting on what I believe. Even if I can't win, even if I know that I'm doomed to be defeated, I still need to do battle, since any other behavior would be treachery. I would not only be betraying the cause, but myself as well.

This is exactly how we fought against the reaction that came on throughout the 1990s. Tactical considerations played a secondary role at best. Those who calculated the odds for success soon gave up, filling the ranks of the turncoats that held forth on how Marxism had no perspective and how the free market was obviously far more effective. Others became admirers of Tony Giddens or associates of Tony Blair, German ministers of the "Red-Green" coalition, or "socially concerned" MPs of "United Russia" (=Putin's party), who accompany each piece of legislation that further curtails the rights of the working population with an outburst of "proletarian" rhetoric. You can't find any more former revolutionaries than among this distinguished ladies and gentlemen. They would be more than happy to overthrow capitalism. But having come to the common-sense conclusion that the revolution will not take place any time soon, that life is short and you don't have forever to pursue a career, they prefer to serve the evils they once helped to denounce. At the same time, they never stop priding themselves on their revolutionary past, using it as a source for moral or material profit, should the suitable occasion arise.

Contempt for these distinguished ladies and gentlemen heightens the decisiveness of resistance. You don't want to become one of them? Then fight, stay true to your principles, fend off all of the petty concerns with odds, all of the questionable tactical benefits.

But still, the logic of resistance is full of ambiguities, which become more and more apparent, the more effectively we resist. The thing is that capitalism is quite capable of surviving resistance. What it cannot survive is revolution, which destroys capitalism for good. Revolutions can fail; in fact, most attempts at revolution usually do. But, as Jean Paul Sartre said before he died, humanity's progress can be seen as a succession of failures. If these unsuccessful attempts hadn't taken place, we would probably still be living under feudalism. The incompleteness or even the tragic defeat of the revolution mean more to history than entire decades of "quiet" development. After experiencing such a social shock, the world will never be same.

But still, let's return to the ideology of resistance. It's no coincidence that this word was first uttered by General de Gaulle in the very beginning of World War Two, when the might of Nazi Germany seemed insurmountable, and the cause of Free France had already been irrevocably lost. The country was occupied, the army disbanded. A sizeable portion of the elite had betrayed the republic, leaving it to the fate's arbitrations. It was completely natural to raise high the banner of resistance under such circumstances. But the purpose wasn't just to stand steadfast, but to emerge victorious. Thanks to the fortitude and self-sacrifice of the early years of the war, victory became something real that could be reached, but in order to come closer to winning, it became necessary to take action in a different way. Tactics, strategies, and coordination were in high demand. What was need were effectivity and organization. In and of itself, the act of resistance is not necessarily organized; instead, it is – above all else - a response to moral pressure.

After the mass demonstrations of Seattle in 1999, when the Word Trade Organization was forced to break off and postpone yet another round of talks on yet another wave of neoliberal reforms, one of the ideologues of the anti-globalist movement, Walden Bellow, announced that this was "our" Stalingrad. Sadly, Walden was wrong. Instead, one could compare Seattle to the battle for Moscow, in which its defenders showed that they were capable of victory, even if the final defeat of Nazism still seemed to lie in the distant future. We have not yet reached the decisive breaking-point in the battle against capitalism. But we are facing a new situation, in which fortitude and constance alone are no longer enough. We need to learn to win.

This means that tactics and organization have become more important. We need more positive programs and politically effective methods of activity. Compromises are possible, if they make moral and strategic sense, because they allow us to come closer to attaining our goals, which, in this way, become far more concrete.

By resisting, we attain a certain kind of moral comfort, all the more because we aren't talking about the conditions of Germany under Hitler, where hanging around with the leftist scene could land you in a concentration camp. There is, of course, a fundamental difference between those who proclaim their ideas from a Western Europe podium, and those who are resisting the power of the transnational corporations somewhere in Nigeria or India, risking their health and even their lives on a daily basis. Usually, those who talk most about the ideals of resistance are usually those who risk the least in defending them.

Of course, this isn't just about repression. In the final analysis, moral risks are not worth less, but probably even mean more. You can live "in confirmity with ignobility", as the Russian writer of the 19th century Saltykov-Shedrin said. You can also simply say "no" to the system and leave it at that. In the latter case, you will be avoiding a panoply of complex and morally ambiguous questions. After all, practical work – oriented at solving concrete problems – continually forces you to make decisions. These decisions are questionable, since they can be mistakes. They raise moral questions that cannot be answered with ready-made responses. Who can you work together with? With whom is cooperation impossible? Where are the boundaries of compromise? From whom can you receive financial support? Under which conditions? How can you guarantee unity and effective organization while preserving democratic life within its bounds? How can we use the disagreements among our enemies to our own benefit? How can we fight to gain power, knowing full well that power corrupts? Contrary to the well-known aphorism from British politics (attributed to Lord Acton), a little bit of power corrupts even more than when power is taken over in full measure, absolutely.

In short, how do we defeat the dragon without becoming similar to dragons ourselves?

There are no general theoretical answers to such questions. They can only be answered through practical action, by acting and remaining aware of the moral and political risks involved, evaluating each mistake critically. The only guarantee consists in the fact that not only individuals but masses act collectively. Sure, loners, even heroes, armed with the wisdom of the most progressive theories, will be wrong. And the masses often also wander astray. They tend to fall prey to illusions, burning up with enthusiasm, but then falling into deep depression. The defeats of the 1980s led to such a mass depression, which remained as a subtext through the hopelessness of the 1990s. But this is actually why we need intellectual who are capable of critical thinking: it is they who can see the perspectives and dangers that the mass cannot recognize. But mass-movements, if they are capable of developing and learning, can and should control "its" intellectuals and politician. However, people are hardly always able to learn from their mistakes. But one person's mistakes can be corrected by the others.

It's easy to understand why anarchist ideas were so fashionable during the epoch of resistance. In the end, why do we need politics, if we can't reach anything on that field anyway? It follows that books calling for a change will appear with anyone ever trying to take power. The grapes are green, just as in Aesop's fable: it is impossible to take power. But it is also impossible to change the world without attempting to come to power. If this were possible, the world would know neither revolution nor political struggle. Those who rule the world, holding on to power, do not only prohibit any transformation of the system, but even refuse to embark upon any compromises before feeling a real threat to their power-base. The opposition rarely succeeds in taking control of power, but it only becomes effective when the ruling class begins to understand that the danger of losing power is completely real.

One has to admit that the majority of people in any society are hardly revolutionaries. This is true for the Marxian proletariate as well as for any other historical class. But this does not mean that the "ordinary human being" is conservative by nature. Instead, he is a romantic reformist. The more the worker realizes his class interests, the more he becomes the system's enemy. Yet this emnity is passive. The readiness to act arise when there are concrete perspectives of success. Loners are destined to resist. Once they have become a mass in uprising, they have already taken the first step toward revolution.



Rating: 4 - 1 voto(s).

No existen comentarios.
Comentario / Comment:
  atención: para realizar comentarios tienes que ser usuario registrado.


13-10-12_ Ivan Krastev: ¿Puede existir la democracia sin confianza?
09-10-11_ Habrá violencia, enfrentamientos y conflicto * Toni Negri
25-12-10_ La Zona Prohibida [NoGoZone]
28-03-10_ Historia de un desafuero
07-11-09_ Ginecidio y anticristo (y el devenir femenino del capitalismo identitario)
22-09-09_ Der Baader Meinhof Komplex
21-06-09_ Why do the people desire walls???
14-06-09_ Los enemigos de la SGAE
13-09-09_ Los piratas desembarcan en Venezia
17-09-09_ TEXTO CAPITAL DE LA TEORÍA QUEER. Treinta y siete años después en castellano (!)
01-01-09_ COMMUNE
14-09-08_ SARAH PALIN: Operation "Castration" * Jacques Alain Miller
09-08-08_ El complejo poético-militar
06-07-08_ Necesito matarte, majestad
25-06-08_ La directiva de la VERGÜENZA
25-06-08_ The bank of common knowledge
12-04-08_ Tragic Extremes * Nietzsche and the Politics of Security
23-04-08_ The governance of Spain: between rock and hard place
09-04-08_ Elecciones y políticas culturales
25-03-08_ Tres apuntes sobre política cultural
02-03-08_ ¿Adónde va España?
10-08-08_ La encrucijada. Acción política, arte y comisariado.
20-02-08_ Lessig al Congreso???
24-01-08_ Made in L.A. * Hecho en los Ángeles
02-03-08_ Campaña del corazón
18-01-08_ Las primera batallas para suceder a RAJOY... OY....OY
25-12-07_ Lo cultural es político
16-04-08_ La producción biopolítica.* (Toni Negri y Michael Hardt)
15-06-08_ Malcolm X en Play Boy (1963)
30-08-07_ Shinzo Abe: out of time
01-01-08_ Gary Grant. El estilo como arte marcial
18-09-07_ El fin de la crítica???
01-08-07_Responsibility and neo-liberalism
26-08-07_ ¿Hay alguien que mole?
31-07-07_ Lo que Bush nos enseña cada día
24-07-07_ "Terror doctors": anatomy of a void concept
10-06-08_ Toni Negri * NoWork Festival 2004 (trans)
07-07-07_ Soldado de la Cyber resistencia
13-07-07_ Éxodo a ningún lugar
11-07-07_ La guerra de la informacion
30-06-07_ ¡Oh No Coronado!
26-06-07_ Como darse de baja de la SGAE
06-06-07_ Neutralidad en la red
11-05-07_ El nuevo pensamiento (que viene / que viene!)
08-05-07_Jihad: Idea and History
16-04-07_ ¿Campaña "antiparatería con doble sentido?
12-04-07_ La SGAE quiere ser el SHERIFF de la RED
12-04-07_ A liberal Muslim's letter to the west
27-03-07_  Jurassic Left: the strange death of France's "deuxième gauche"
24-03-07_ Jesus Camp
13-03-07_ Pedro J. censura a elmundo.es
11-03-07_ Conspiradores del futuro
24-02-07_ Major news: FAIR USE and FILM
23-02-07_ El misterio Gordon Thomas
20-02-07_ El Mundo y la verdad
18-02-07_  The new information ecosystem 
11-02-07_ The four faces of World Economic Forum
09-02-07_ El búnker judicial
30-01-07_ ¿Sirve de algo el boicot cultural?
28-01-07_ Revolution or Resistance
23-01-07_ Demagogo e injusto...
22-01-07_ Is another world possible without the women's perspective? 
19-01-07_ Bush TV
18-01-07_ Bush's White Whale
16-01-07_ Pequeños detalles clave
16-01-07_ Contra el fatalismo económico
11-01-07_ El papelito... el papelón...
09-01-07_ Flujos antagonistas * geografías de la multitud
09-01-07_  Is this how humans behave? 
01-01-07_ Aberrante (vídeo íntegro de la ejecución de Sadam)
30-12-06_ El índice de corrupción de los diplomáticos multados.
26-12-06_ La amenaza de la paradoja del control
20-12-06_ Nueva campaña de adoctrinamiento
14-12-06_ Adios al ASESINO
05-12-06_ Information liberation
05-12-06_ Let the IP debate begin.......
27-11-06_  Mahfouz's grave, Arab liberalism's deathbed
18-11-06_ A curse on difference: gays vs zealots in Israel 
13-11-06_ Climate change: the global test 
29-10-07_ TAZ * Chaos
08-11-06_ Un pequeño análisis sobre el éxito de Ciutadans (actualizado 8 _11_06)

01-11-06_Bienal NO, ARTE todos los días
01-11-06_Señores de la SGAE
25-10-06_Information between old and new worlds
22-10-06_T.A.Z.: The Temporary Autonomous Zone (1993)
17-10-06_Getting colder * climate change and America's elections
25-10-06_Orhan Pamuk’s epic journey
08-10-06_Sexo, China y la SGAE
09-10-06_Latin America’s new left: dictators or democrats?
30-09-06_Stanford Prison Experiment
28-09-06_¿Cuál es mi cámara?
24-09-06_Y Dios en el bolsillo de todos
20-09-06_Wired on OpenBusiness and Free Beer
18-09-06_The Free Voice of Labor: The Jewish Anarchists
13-09-06_Gallardón, 'el Artista'
14-03-10_ TAZ * Utopías piratas
08-09-06_L'Monde Diplomatique * Tele-Encuentro Iberoamericano
06-09-06_Trashorras * Un buen chico
30-08-06_Anonymity on the net
20-08-06_Lebanon, Israel and the “greater west Asian crisis”
15-08-06_Carta de Ho Chi Min a Lyndon B. Johnson
15-08-06_An unfinished war
13-08-06_The levels of democracy
11-08-06_France and Lebanon: diplomacy of tragedy
01-08-06_México fragmentado
13-03-07_ En marcha el partido pirata español
20-07-06_Killing a nation, one airstrike at a time
06-07-06_El 'software' libre planta cara a las patentes...
01-07-06_Stopping the Big Giveaway * by John Kerry
30-06-06_Torture teachers
18-06-06_Planet Basel * La madre de todas las batallas
12-06-06_The Vietnam Obsession
09-06-06_Disinformation TV (Things you're not supposed to know)
30-05-06_Por una buena causa
19-05-06_S.O.S. Baronesa
06-06-06_Why Drunks Make Better Politicians
06-06-06_The Hackocracy * Why a MBA president can't manage the government
06-05-06_Entrevista * Catherine David
04-05-06_Interview with José Luis de Vicente
19-04-06_El pequeño Losantos y el Gran Wyoming
13-03-07_ Play Fuckin' Loud: Zizek Versus the Left •
09-04-06_¿La política controla al arte?
09-04-06_Manual de comportamineto...
06-04-06_La Próxima invasión
01-04-06_What Price Art?
01-04-06_ Letter of Resignation...
25-03-06_Political Games: conciencia política online
28-03-06_Los barones del PP buscan esperanza
18-03-06_Starship troopers
14-03-06_Entrevista | Toni Negri & Michael Hardt
13-03-06_Entrevista | J. G. Ballard
12-03-06_Nueva estrategia hiperpolítica
04-03-06_Methamphetamine Propaganda
27-09-07_ Francis Fukuyama: The acceptable face of the neo-cons?
01-03-06_Europe vs. Radical Islam
25-02-06_El sí de las niñas
03-08-07_ La postguerra de los movimientos
12-02-06_Derrick De Kerckhove: «soy global y ustedes también»
11-02-06_Intelligence, Policy,and the War in Iraq
07-02-06_El arte de los anfitriones
07-02-06_Las dos fotografías de Susan Sontag
03-02-06_¿Qué España?
03-02-06_Same old song
29-01-06_Déclassement : quand l'ascenseur social descend
29-01-06_Warriors and wusses
23-01-06_Carta a América
20-01-06_Fog of Secrecy
20-01-06_The Impeachment of George W. Bush
13-01-06_Why Drunks Make Better Politicians
06-01-06_What's in a hat?
06-01-06_Abramoff won't go down alone
17-12-05_In Speech, Bush Says He Ordered Domestic Spying
08-12-05_Discurso íntegro de Harold Pinter de aceptación del Nobel de Literatura
25-11-05_The political as a truth procedure
12-11-05_Variaciones del discurso sobre la integración
07-11-05_NO al cierre de la Sala Montcada de Barcelona
28-10-05_Prosecutor to Speak Soon; No Indictment for Rove Today
15-10-05_La Creación, según Bush
08-10-05_Creative Commons pide ayuda
20-09-05_¡BIENVENIDO A EE.UU.!
08-06-05_Arte, Instituciones y Democracia
23-07-07_ La Cultura del Mal



Regístrate y disfruta de utilidades de administración y gestión de los contenidos de e-limbo*
Recibe las novedades en tu correo electronico.
El futuro está escrito en las estrellas... Horóscopo creado por J.G. Ballard y dedicado a todos vosotros.
Aplicaciones y herramientas necesarias para navegar y utilizar los contenidos del limbo electrónico e internet (www).
Artículos de e-limbo* en formato PDF preparados para viajar y aportar información allá donde estés. (y seguir salvando árboles)

_e-limbo * apoya



Mais uma edição do podcast Música Livre para o Archivo Vivo, do Centro Cultural da Espanha/AECID. ...
Ante preguntas de oyentes y amigos, puedo responder ahora que Vía Límite continuará en Radio ...
SORPRESA¡!¡! An unreleased version of Talking Heads' "Psycho Killer" with Arthur Russell on cello
Optimizado: Firefox, Safari, Mozilla, Netscape, Konqueror, Explorer. Resolución óptima: 1024x768
ISSN: 1885-5229    Aviso Legal e-limbo.org*