e-limbo, e-zine de informacion y analasis de modos de vida actual
20.04.2018 / Sesión no Iniciada 

 _enviar articulo

e-mail emisor
e-mail receptor
Ayúdanos a evitar contactos automáticos
Anti Spam

En estos tiempos de hipercomunicación bastaría la invitación de enviar a un amigo cualquiera de los textos que consideres interesantes algo redundante: demasiada comunicación, demasiados textos y , en general, demasiado de todo.
Es posible que estemos de acuerdo... pero cuando encuentras algo interesante en cualquier sitio, la red, la calle, tu casa, o un lugar escondido y remoto, compartirlo no sólo es un acto (acción, hecho) de amistad o altruismo, también es una manera de ahorrar tiempo a los demás (y de que te lo ahorren a ti (si eres afortunado) a costa del tiempo que tu has podido derrochar (emplear) y el gustazo de mostrar que estuviste ahí (o donde fuera ) un poco antes (el tiempo ya no es más el que era).
Comparte con tus conocidos aquello que encuentras, es evolución.
Interview * Michael Bauwens
16-01-07 openbusiness.cc  


Michel Bauwens is an contemporary thinker and Peer-to-Peer theorist who has just been interviewed by Michael Holloway on behalf of OpenBusiness.


Bauwens has worked as an internet consultant, information analyst for the United States Information Agency, information manager for British Petroleum (where he created one of the first virtual information centers), and is former editor-in-chief of the first European digital convergence magazine Wave.

With Frank Theys, Bauwens is the co-creator of a 3 hour documentary TechnoCalyps. He taught and co-edited two French language anthologies on the Anthropology of Digital Society. Bauwens is the author of a number of on-line essays, including a seminal thesis Peer to Peer and Human Evolution. He is editor of P2P News.
He now lives in Chiang Mai, Thailand, where he created the Foundation for P2P Alternatives. He has taught courses on the anthropology of digital society to postgraduate students at ICHEC/St. Louis in Brussels, Belgium and a related course at Payap University and Chiang Mai University in Thailand.

OB: Let's start by introducing the 3 processes which characterise and distinguish your conceptual framework 'p2p theory'.

Bauwens: Peer to peer is the relational dynamic at work in distributed networks. Key to distributed networks is the absence of external or hierarchical coercion, leaving agents free to choose what they do and their relations.

These networks are becoming the key infrastructure for technologies such as email, the web and so forth as well as a key organizational format. It gives rise to three fundamental processes.

The first occurs when people produce something in common. This is called peer production and you can see it in projects such as Linux or Wikipedia. It is a kind of 'passionate production', based on voluntary self-selection, free cooperation, and it results in products that are free to use. Since there is no obligatory hierarchy, no wage dependence; since the resources are not allocated through market mechanisms, and since there are no prices, it can be called a third mode of production.

The process of free cooperation itself, in terms of how these projects are managed, can be called peer governance. Again it is neither a state nor corporate bureaucracy, nor it is based on political representation, so it can be called a third mode of governance.

We can also identify the new form of peer property, which guards against the private appropriation of the common work. This is not a form of state owned, public property, nor is it private exclusionary property owned by a corporation. Rather it is a form of distribution that allows – indeed encourages - anybody to use it, provided they respect the common origin, and put improvements or changes under the same format.
These three processes give rise to three important paradigms:

  1. the open and free paradigm, ensures that peer production has access to raw material to work with.
  2. the participatory paradigm, refers to the process of cooperation, to ensure maximum participation
  3. the third paradigm refers to the institutional format of the Commons, created by the common production, which in turn becomes the free and open raw material for a new round.

OB: OpenBusiness documents and analyses business models that allow peer-producers to make money. Can you locate the OB project in the context of 'p2p theory'?

Bauwens: I really like the OpenBusiness initiative, which relates closely to my own interests. However, much of what I see as non-reciprocal peer production does not need to be monetized. That it operates outside the market is a unique quality, in terms of what it brings to our world.

Keeping in mind the 'crowding out' effects of introducing for-profit logics in the for-benefit environment, peer projects have to be extremely careful in the use of funding. We have seen that extreme care is needed in case of the direct financing of production.

The crowding out effect is less problematic where sharing is unintended or just icing on the cake however, and there revenue-sharing might be the equitable thing to do. However, most of the value is received by the very fact of giving (reputation, knowledge, relationships) which is why it does not seem high on the priority of the contributors to sites like YouTube etc.

Although we should resist the temptation to 'marketize' everything, this new use-value creates the possibility for derivative services, and this is where the OpenBusiness initiative comes in, to examine in more detail how the two worlds intersect.

OpenBusiness would benefit from increased formalization, typologies, models so that the community are presented with a clearer view of the choices.

OB: How is the role of project manager / facilitator fulfilled in an instance of 'distributed leadership'?

Bauwens: Projects and sub-projects appear to need a dedicated leadership. Someone has to have a vision of the project, an interest in its going forward, gently pushing the willingness of people to contribute.

Of course, different projects use different kinds of such leadership. At the P2P Foundation I, half jokingly, use the term of Chief (p)Leader to describe a person who gains the respect of the other co-operators through his engagement with the project. Since it is all based on volunteering, there is no command structure, only motivation, hence the 'pleading'. Next to this "benevolent dictator" model, some other projects use majority voting, or a rolling roster of voluntary leaders who take turns (I think this is the case for Perl).

OB: You discuss holoptism and non-hierarchical participation in your writing. Can you summarise these practices and point to successful examples in both the public and private sector?

Bauwens: Holoptism contrasts with hierarchical panoptism, where information flows so that only the elite has a total vision of what is happening. By contrast, in peer production, holoptic transparency is inscribed in the very way the technological tools are designed. Every line of code in free software, or line of text in a wiki, can be attributed, and there is extensive version control. This ensures transparency within these projects.

In classic hierarchical, or semi-hierarchical environments this would also require cultural and behavioural adaptation. An example of this is when extensive verbal communication between few is not recorded in the system, acting as an exclusionary filter for everyone else.
OB: Who are the 'netarchists', and where do they fit into your theories?

Bauwens: The concept of netarchists helps to explain the logic of rule in our mixed capitalist / participatory society. The rule of the industrial owners has been left behind long ago and the locus of power is shifting.

The basis of both cognitive and vectoral capitalism is being undermined by the new peer to peer practices. It has become increasingly difficult to maintain the artificial scarcities on which monopoly rents are based, and producers of content no longer have to pass through the classical vectors of the mass media age.

These are being replaced by the creators of participatory platforms, the Web 2.0 type of companies, in other words, the netarchists. Their role is double. As enablers of participatory platforms, they support and enhance p2p developments, but as private companies, they seek to monetize it. Advertisers pay them for their aggregation function.

For peer producers, it is easy now to create use value, but still rather more difficult to monetize it and to make a living from those creations. The emergence of netarchists is creating a whole new set of issues of equity and distribution of value. For example, with companies like YouTube producers are asked to sign away rights to their creations though it seems they recently changed this practice. Even still it is obviously no longer necessary to rely on strong protection of IP rights to build a business.

OB: What are your hopes for extension of P2P beyond the immaterial sphere?

Bauwens: There are good reasons to suggest p2p is only appropriate for immaterial production: the abundance and / or distribution aspects that are necessary to have distributed networks are primarily present in software and knowledge creation. Yet any production process has a design phase, and that design phase is an immaterial process that is similar to knowledge creation. Hypothetically, many manufacturing processes could have a first phase as peer production, perhaps an open source car, that would then be produced subsequently by market forces. We can also already see that sharing involves physical products: think of file-sharing as using physical computers, of car-pooling, or the bottom-up telco network creation of Skype. These are also user-created capital pools, as are Prosper and Zopa as P2P lending sites. We'll see more of this kind of crowdfunding in the future.

The general question then becomes: how can we distribute financial and physical resources more, so as to enable more P2P alternatives? The answer is both technological and political, as a lot of concentration is maintained through political and economic power. So this is the first part of my answer: to the degree that we can distribute material resources and inputs, we enable more P2P.

Another pathway is the intelligent combination of physical objects, logical objects and digital data. Take Bookcrossings: you have a physical book, to which you attach a logical object (it can be used by all), and you give it a digital identifier. This is why there is now a successful white bicycle program in German , because before, such a combination was impossible, and the cycles got stolen. So we have the possibility, through Semapedia-type tools , to create a lot of innovative commons solutions. Peter Barnes, in his new book on Capitalism 3.0, explains how we could create many such common trusts, based on the principle, one citizen, one share, and vote; and how they could better protect our environmental resources than either the state or the private market.

My vision of the future is that we'll have a core of non-reciprocal peer production, surrounded by a re-invigorated gift-based service and traditional economy; a peer-informed marketplace no longer solely based on extortion and power relationships; and peer-informed 'multi-stakeholder' forms of governance. In the traditional civil society - market - state, the core effecting the most pull, will be civil society, the autonomous production.



Rating: 4 - 1 voto(s).

No existen comentarios.
Comentario / Comment:
  atención: para realizar comentarios tienes que ser usuario registrado.


15-01-12_ "Recapitalizar a los bancos por tener deuda de su país es absurdo"
24-01-11_ Sociedad Estatal de Demoliciones Culturales
18-09-09_ LA comercialización de la cultura
26-10-08_ Solbes: «2009 va a ser peor, no cabe la menor duda»
02-01-09_ The Story of Stuff
05-10-08_ SOROS * entrevista
21-05-08_ Why People Don't Trust Free Markets
02-05-08_ Zimbabue compra por Internet para sortear una inflación del 100.000%
24-03-08_ IDEIA DEKOT * Manual de supervivencia para montártelo por tu cuenta
04-02-08_ ¿'CRACK' 2008?
24-03-08_ Copia privada, ese derecho virtual
24-03-08_ The Pirate's Dilemma: A Review
23-12-07_ Así en la SGAE como en la Iglesia
17-12-07_ Dos asociaciones denuncian que la SGAE financia al poder judicial
16-12-07_ RECIPE: Five Great Lunchbox Favs
25-11-07_ Invitation to the OpenBusiness Community
15-11-07_ Trade-offs of offering content for free
16-11-07_ Climate change * from issue to magnifier
22-10-07_ SGAE: la punta del iceberg de un entramado societario...
02-11-07_ La JUSTICIA y el P2P ( ¡! )
14-09-07_ Executive Compensation: Is This the Beginning of a New Era?
06-07-07_ Collapse: How the U.S. Is Choosing to Fail
26-06-07_ The market function of piracy
24-05-07_ Seven gay wonders of the world
29-08-07_ Designig for Humans Not Users
31-05-07_ Introducing... the starving artist
31-05-07_ Martín Patino liberará su Filmografía.
31-05-07_ People Inside Web 2.0: An Interview with Tim O'Reilly
29-05-07_ Rutas para la innovación abierta: costes, aceleración y creatividad
26-03-07_ WEB 2.0 según TechCrunch
24-03-07_ Arcadi Espada y el Canon
17-03-07_ Ni se le ocurra tatarear a Mozart
15-03-07_ ¿Cómo hacer un blog de economía?
13-03-07_ El brujo de Menlo Park
03-03-07_ Mobile the 7th Mass Media is to internet like TV is to radio
23-02-07_ Hacia el fin del COPYRIGHT
18-02-07_  Shit Help Bad Hot Army Boom Kill!!! 
07-02-07_ Pensamientos sobre la música * Steve Jobs
04-02-07_ MOD Films
03-02-07_ Si no te conectas es por que no quieres...
30-01-07_ Emerging Art Markets
27-01-07_ The "special interests" destroying China's environment
17-01-07_ La SGAE vista desde dentro...
16-01-07_ Interview * Michael Bauwens
10-01-07_ Pero plagiar es otra cosa
04-01-07_ Amenazas a la información

04-01-07_ Los Múltiples retos de la innovación
28-12-06_ Comprando Burgos, La ciudad...
25-12-06_ The inexplicable inexistence of Real Madrid
11-12-06_ Openstudio * Experimento en creatividad, colaboración y capitalismo.
03-12-06_ Open Business re-crea la comunidad
27-11-06_ Cafuné breaking the limits for Open Business models
23-11-06_  Business Model Template Hacking
18-11-06_ O.J. Simpson, News Corp, and Milton Friedman
13-11-06_ Stray Cinema
01-11-06_Del Elitismo de la Web 1.0 a la Burbuja 2.0
01-11-06_How Non-Commercial Licenses make Business
26-10-06_He vuelto de Ikea y mi único deseo es matar (I)
25-10-06_A new idea about Opening Business
19-10-06_Revver - Openbusiness New Sponsor
08-10-06_Is Your Personality the Ticket to Financial Freedom?
30-09-06_The Wrong Gallery * The greatest little gallery on earth
22-09-06_el sin-sentido de las patentes
21-09-06_Open Business Meets Filmaking
16-09-06_IndieKarma * a new way to get paid for blogging
09-09-06_Revolution at our fingertips
08-09-06_La 'wikimanía' se extiende por la Red
01-09-06_Copyright Criminals: This is a Sampling Sport
31-08-06_Man From Google Joins Apple’s Board
18-08-06_Patents for profit: dystopian visions of the new economy
13-08-06_The cluetrain manifesto
10-08-06_Depositos finacieros, vivienda y deducción fiscal
07-08-06_YOU TUBE * me watch
05-08-06_Reunión mundial de piratas informáticos en Las Vegas
04-08-06_Lo que les preocupa a los poderosos
13-03-07_ Ya hay más de 500.000 firmas contra el canon digital
23-07-06_Con la moral por delante
22-07-06_Gateway to Nowhere?
21-07-06_Industria musical y cultura libre: hoy en el CCCB
30-06-06_People Power
15-06-06_El futuro del libro: líquido o en la Red
13-06-06_Casas que están vivas
05-06-06_The fall and rise of Kate Moss
24-05-06_Primera Gran Guerra por el control de la Red
23-05-06_The sunset stalker: Bono
06-06-06_The greedy truth about media consultants
07-06-06_Making meaning from our own stories (Selflore) in the age of discontinuity
22-04-06_La crítica en la era del capitalismo cultural electrónico
05-04-06_La SGAE bate su propio récord de ingresos... y +++
29-03-06_How Copyright Law Changed Hip Hop
03-05-06_China acapara ya el 19% de las reservas internacionales de divisas
25-03-06_Intellectual Property roundup
24-03-06_De Gutenberg a Amazon: cómo convertirse en autor de verdad, sin salir de casa
19-03-06_La mala política energética de Bush
17-03-06_Los estudiantes franceses vuelven a la calle
16-03-06_Brent Hoberman:
06-03-06_Los ‘sukuk’, o cómo invertir sin ofender los mandamientos del profeta
06-03-06_More power to you
18-02-06_I Do, I Do, I Do, I Do
02-03-06_Trabajo afectivo
13-02-06_El parlamento de las cosas
19-03-06_Entrevista: Sabine Breitwieser
07-02-06_El dividendo del arte
03-02-06_Adieu Alan, Bonjour Ben, Welcome Transparency
30-01-06_ Prescribing Drugs a Healthy Future
20-01-06_Vers la décroissance: Écofascisme ou écodémocratie
27-01-06_The New Market Bubble Theory
16-01-06_We need a new drug (system)
13-01-06_Garçon! Un Coca-Cola, S'il Vous Plaît
09-01-06_Weather Has Become Bogeyman, News Staple
07-01-06_La inmigración en España / Una obsesión desbordada
04-01-06_Novel Thinking as a Survival Tactic
27-12-05_África, un desacuerdo navideño con Bono
23-12-05_America's most-hated companies
21-12-05_¡Tu Mismo!
03-12-05_El bajo perfil de España en Estados Unidos
29-09-05_Infinita Avaricia
22-06-05_Por ahí
09-06-05_¡Tu Mismo!



Regístrate y disfruta de utilidades de administración y gestión de los contenidos de e-limbo*
Recibe las novedades en tu correo electronico.
El futuro está escrito en las estrellas... Horóscopo creado por J.G. Ballard y dedicado a todos vosotros.
Aplicaciones y herramientas necesarias para navegar y utilizar los contenidos del limbo electrónico e internet (www).
Artículos de e-limbo* en formato PDF preparados para viajar y aportar información allá donde estés. (y seguir salvando árboles)

_e-limbo * apoya



Mais uma edição do podcast Música Livre para o Archivo Vivo, do Centro Cultural da Espanha/AECID. ...
Ante preguntas de oyentes y amigos, puedo responder ahora que Vía Límite continuará en Radio ...
SORPRESA¡!¡! An unreleased version of Talking Heads' "Psycho Killer" with Arthur Russell on cello
Optimizado: Firefox, Safari, Mozilla, Netscape, Konqueror, Explorer. Resolución óptima: 1024x768
ISSN: 1885-5229    Aviso Legal e-limbo.org*