e-limbo, e-zine de informacion y analasis de modos de vida actual
19.09.2020 / Sesión no Iniciada 

 _enviar articulo

e-mail emisor
e-mail receptor
Ayúdanos a evitar contactos automáticos
Anti Spam

En estos tiempos de hipercomunicación bastaría la invitación de enviar a un amigo cualquiera de los textos que consideres interesantes algo redundante: demasiada comunicación, demasiados textos y , en general, demasiado de todo.
Es posible que estemos de acuerdo... pero cuando encuentras algo interesante en cualquier sitio, la red, la calle, tu casa, o un lugar escondido y remoto, compartirlo no sólo es un acto (acción, hecho) de amistad o altruismo, también es una manera de ahorrar tiempo a los demás (y de que te lo ahorren a ti (si eres afortunado) a costa del tiempo que tu has podido derrochar (emplear) y el gustazo de mostrar que estuviste ahí (o donde fuera ) un poco antes (el tiempo ya no es más el que era).
Comparte con tus conocidos aquello que encuentras, es evolución.
The Queen: an elegiac prophecy
28-09-06 opendemocracy.net  


The real target of Stephen Frears's depiction of a British queen under siege from politicians and people following Princess Diana's death is the constitutional system embodied in Tony Blair's imperial prime ministership. Tom Nairn, pioneering critic of Britain's monarchical state, views the film and looks beyond.

Tom Nairn

The Queen
is much more than an elegy for the British monarchy. By recounting in 2006 the real elegiac events of the first week of September 1997 - the death of and popular lamentation for Diana, Princess of Wales - director Stephen Frears and writer Peter Morgan have extended the target of denunciation from crown to state. Unlike most journalistic or academic essays, they touch upon certain deeper feelings and attitudes. Like poets, film directors and scriptwriters may sometimes try to be unacknowledged legislators of an age - and in this case, I think that some acknowledgement is due.

Thin political rectitude often dismisses such concern as sentimental or frivolous, and The Queen hasn't entirely escaped the treatment: exploitation of mere gossip, impropriety of presenting living people who can't answer back, the supposed quirks of Royal Household personalities - and so on. Fortunately, few hearts touched by the tale are likely to worry over these fences. Today they stand in dire need of such legislation, even more than at the time of the dreadful events in the Paris tunnel.

Frears's focus is indeed on the stilted theatre of a regal establishment accustomed to ritual worship and obedience, and unable to understand the weird revolution going on outside its front gate. However, the accompanying point is to show how that contradiction was resolved by the other Great-British Household, the one at 10 Downing Street. And the film has appeared just as the latter is writhing under a siege worse than that of Buckingham Palace in 1997.

The story is of a shortlived reprieve, within a continuing historical trial and judgment. The film does use hindsight wisdom to hint at this; but after all, it's only reminding the audience of what it knows already (and not only in Great Britain). In the film script, Helen Mirren's depth as an actress almost makes plausible a suggestion that, at the time, Queen Elizabeth may have understood how temporary her salvation might prove. Naturally that will only be verifiable at greater historical distance.

The subject people

Even at nine years' distance, however, the question is effectively posed of just what was so smartly "saved" in 1997, and of what is likely to succeed the story's real end, as yet unreached. Camilla Parker-Bowles country? Not at all likely, in the view of Frears and Morgan. They know what they're talking about here, having previously made a drama-documentary about the rise of Blair, and his long wrangle with his chancellor Gordon Brown. And most viewers probably agree with them.

The 1997 revolution was weird, but real, and is now showing itself to be irresistible in another disconcerting form. Today, the adroit saviour of the crown from post-Diana wrath finds himself the victim of much greater popular resentment, his party torn apart by implausible successors fighting madly to (once more) restore a dying régime. While Queen Elizabeth II may yet check one or more of them in at Buckingham Palace, few will see in this more than a rite of passage; and fewer still will expect King Charles III to carry on bestowing the sovereign power.

But how is this possible? The principal actor in The Queen is not the much-praised Helen Mirren. It is the people in the streets. The film displays this movingly, without needless excess. At first we see a few bunches of flowers beside the palace guardsmen; then something astonishing happens. Looking backwards from the film's vantage-point, it can be seen as a single colossal heartbeat, which deposited across the middle of London a floral ocean of mingled grief, longing, inscriptions and bad verse, and endured through to Diana's funeral and internment.

The Frears film makes sense because a good deal of this persists, nine years later. It was an act of presence, as it were, and not merely of whimsy or nostalgia. A turning so profound and unexpected was not related exclusively to the victims in the Paris tunnel. This is, incidentally, why the doubts and recriminations about Diana herself (common in 1997 and dusted off for the film) seem irrelevant. The car-crash triggered something else. It was "in people's hearts" all right; but not only in individual romantic fantasies. A rediscovered societal instinct was at work too, a togetherness - a sensation related to underlying community and will, to identity and "what we stand for" (or ought to stand for) as both people and state.

Both place and time are too important to leave out. One can call it "nationalism", I suppose, but more definition is needed. The United Kingdom population inhabits a country where since the mid-19th century an extensive, important zone of popular imagination had been over-concentrated upon royalty.

The royal imaginary

For a society anchored in class rigidities, this proved an ideology capable of holding together the emerging collectivity of modern, urbanised nationalities. And it did so by avoiding (or minimising) the abstract concepts that had been linked to earlier modern revolutions like those in America, France and elsewhere. Queen Victoria's nationhood emphasised the new period's romance and circumscribed its principles of universal liberté and egalité.

David Cannadine and others have shown how UK circumstances favoured this lopsided style of "imagined community", and thus bore early-modern forms into the age of empires. Other states did try the formula, like Austria-Hungary, the Russian Czardom and Spain; but none succeeded so well.

All too well, one could also say. The system's underlying archaism absorbed working-class socialism well enough, but would eventually give way under the tensions of a less restrained capitalism. This is why locating the drama retold in The Queen is so important: it was roughly halfway between the expulsion of Margaret Thatcher (1988-90) and that of her successor, Blair (2005-07). Their two "-isms" have marked the principal phases of capital's social triumph and domestic integration.

It is often too readily assumed that empire was itself responsible for the reconstruction and popularity of the British monarchy. Certainly, the UK's global and naval overstretch encouraged anachronism to persist; but this wasn't just via uniforms, borrowed bagpipes and cut-price overlordship. Such conditions also diluted and staged capitalism's domestic mutation. While British societies had of course been pioneers of capitalist development they were never (so to speak) alone with it, until Mrs Thatcher's assumption of office in 1979. Only after that did they find themselves simultaneously deprived of "overseas", the former patriciate, credentials of Greatness, and the supposed alternatives of socialism.

Hence a sourness and confused nostalgia was to poison the material achievements of the 1990s, a longing that failed to find a name - until Diana provided one, and then consummated it with her death. The old royal establishment had merely gone along with the process; now here it was back, emanating a fossilised indifference to popular feelings by denying the new music, and burying itself at Balmoral.

A far horn

In the film we hear Prince Charles whining about being a "moderniser" in the background. But Blair understood the great force of a claimant and disappointed nationalism, and how - unless tamed - it could sweep away much more than the monarchy. He was already aiming to defuse peripheral nationalism (in Scotland and Wales) with devolution. But the moral collapse of Windsordom was that much more important. It would have really put the "Third Way" on the spot, and had to be averted. Frears relates how the "people's princess" was accorded due recognition: Queen Elizabeth was first nudged then dragged back to London, where the mutinous crowds found they "weren't so bad" after all.

Thus "Blairism" could carry on. That is, the old two-party see-saw, a domesticated House of Lords, and sufficient continuity to make the masses swallow more deregulation, a diminished public sector, and more supine dependence on the United States in lieu of former grandeur. Had the royal pillars of the old constitution collapsed, then it would have been difficult to avoid reforming all the rest. No think-tank could have "invented" a new monarchy today: some kind of republicanism would have imposed itself. And that would have been very hard without replacement of Westminster, and of the winner-takes-all machinery so dear to both great modernising parties.

This is what "grovelling" is about. The film skilfully shows how it worked in Blair's personal case; but Gordon Brown is also on record as thinking the royals "do a very good job". Bowing to Her Majesty encourages people to bow in other directions as well. Thus modernisation can become instant tradition, and an instinct for continuity is maintained. That's what Anglo-British modernisation is about: never allowing it to get the upper hand, not being carried away by it.

In this perspective, millions of people getting carried away by tears and inchoate longing is clearly the worst of precedents. If they felt they had demolished the monarchy, what might they not get rid off next? Blair's press secretary Alastair Campbell and wife Chérie Blair are shown in the script as mocking the mummified features of courtly existence. But this is thin scorn, meant to support Westminster's half-democracy by decrying excesses and moribund rituals.

What the mourners then got was Blairism, the prosecution of Thatcher's socio-economic revolution, prostration before George W Bush, war in Mesopotamia and Afghanistan, evasiveness in Europe and the pumping up of Britain's pretended world role (including its nuclear arms). It is not necessary here to deny all saving graces to Blair's (or Brown's) domestic policies. But for the government that began by saving Queen and crown, foreign policy was to grow ever more dominant, eclipsing their effects.

Saving and being able to mobilise British nationalism has always been the key issue. These powers were implicitly menaced by any unsanctioned surge of popular feeling or resentment - like the huge anti-war demonstrations that filled some of the same streets a few years later. Opening such doors is itself the threat, even without banners declaring "Republicanism - This Way!"

In this film we see how Blair and Campbell saved the old essence of state. Then viewers come out blinking into the light of Gordon Brown's attempt to "elect a new people" (in Bertolt Brecht's famous dictum) that might settle for a new modernised, quasi-American "vision" - that is, an orderly all-British identity, more capable of containing devolution and multicultural discontents within prescribed limits, and thus of renewing ancien régime leadership (I and others have written at greater length on this theme in a special book-length issue - entitled "Gordon Brown: Bard of Britishness" - of Agenda [Cardiff], the journal of the Institute of Welsh Affairs).

British republicanism is unthinkable solely in these hidebound Anglo-British terms. One need only look across to Ireland and observe how the population of a republic enjoys voting for a symbolic president. And in a way, that's what the enormous mourning crowds were doing in 1997, and why they had to be stopped: they were as good as "voting" with feet and flowers for something hopefully better, more humane, sweeter and more meaningful.

But shortly thereafter, in 2001 and 2005, about half of them wouldn't bother to vote at all, for anything on offer from the post-funereal, living-dead régime. They were not to be allowed a Mary Robinson, or a President Mary McAleese. Like an elected second chamber, a president might have interfered with the preserved and sacred essence: prime-ministerial and party authority, the old pantomime that has "served us so well".

A civil society denied state and constitutional reforms appropriate to the great changes it has suffered, ends by "reforming itself" piecemeal, fragmentarily, emotively, sometimes blindly or negatively, or by dissociation, withdrawal and escape. The Queen recounts a milestone-episode in this breakdown: the moment when a people stopped recognising itself in the traditional looking-glass, and called for another, only to be rewarded with Prince Charles, a warlord-premier, and the crazily enhanced power of the other Household at Number 10 Downing Street.

One of the most discussed sequences of the film shows Her Majesty stranded in a corner of the Balmoral wilderness, communing with a magnificent stag. Is this the errant spirit of Diana, or simply of something other and better? Anyway she advises him to make himself scarce, since Philip and his boys are out with the guns. Hopeless, naturally: she later finds the beheaded corpse strung up, and it turns out the kill was prolonged, and probably agonising. It bled to death in stages, an appropriate symbol for the later phase of Blairism.

Sure, these "legislators" of the heart don't end with formulae for what ought to come next. All we can know - more certainly after the movie - is that it will not be like the timeless essence so complacently projected in the conclusion of Kenneth O Morgan's Twentieth-Century Britain : A Very Short Introduction (2000), a work one can only hope has not bled too many non-Brits to academic death: "Debates over the significance of Diana's death offered insights into the abiding folk memory...At the dawn of the new millennium, as in times of greater pomp and power in the past, the values of being British could still be affirmed and sustained. So might they be again, in centuries yet to unfold..."

Come on, republicans of all nations and classes; give this kind of stuff both barrels, Diana and the stag will be with you.


This article originally appeared on openDemocracy.net under a Creative Commons licence. To view the original article, please click here.


Rating: 4 - 1 voto(s).

No existen comentarios.
Comentario / Comment:
  atención: para realizar comentarios tienes que ser usuario registrado.


07-04-16_Una nueva IMAGINACIÓN
24-04-16_ The films of Nick Zedd
15-01-12_ Un arte de intervalos. El cine según Jacques Ranciére
15-01-12_ Lies and bonds
24-04-11_ Para una conjetura estética de la maldad
16-11-10_ Botanica mutante y otras hierbas
21-11-10_ pre-position n. 3: ON
21-11-10_ Restrospectiva en corto
17-10-10_ 9 Postales desde el cine de Ciencia Ficción
19-04-10_ Alice Through The Lens
10-01-10_ SÉ LO QUE ES CUANDO LO VEO* breve intro a la imagen pornográfica
31-10-09_ Snuff: A Documentary About Killing on Camera
17-09-09_ FILMINUTE
18-09-09_ Captain Celluloid vs the Film Pirates
13-09-09_ Lo no pornográfico
14-06-09_ The Manson Family
14-06-09_ Las paradojas del ARTE
17-09-09_ John Wisniewski interviews Jack Sargeant
24-05-09_Matar al padre
10-05-09_ Autista, bisexual, flaca, pequeña y peligrosa
19-04-09_ CONTROL
09-02-09_ The Archers Manifesto
15-12-08_ El destino del cine como arte * Jacques Rancière
26-10-08_ Películas extrañas
01-11-08_ La ética que Hollywood nos dejó
11-10-08_ VERTOV * El hombre y la cámara
18-09-09_ A Walk Into the Sea * Danny Williams and the Warhol Factory
20-09-08_ Derek Jarman * JUBILEE
18-09-09_ Los organos sin cuerpo de Hitchcock
20-07-08_ Stanley Kubrick's Boxes
22-07-08_ Jack Chambers * The hart of London
18-09-09_ 50 AÑOS CON "VÉRTIGO" 1958-2008 (I) * Intro 
15-06-08_ El estúpido ritmo de los demás
22-07-08_ LIQUID SKY ;-)
25-06-08_ TAKESHI KITANO * Master Class + El imprevisible (txt)
15-06-08_ El cine según Slavoj Zizek
15-06-08_ BLAST of SILENCE
25-05-08_ Koji Wakamatsu
11-05-08_ Tulse Puper !¡ 1...2...3...
23-04-08_ Agitar, protestar, educar
27-04-08_ Leer en la oscuridad
27-04-08_ DIVINE TRASH
13-04-08_ Humildad sublime
24-03-08_ Stan Brakhage * Interview with Pip Chodorov
08-06-08_ The tao of Cristina Ricci
27-02-08_ Las películas de Philip K. Dick
17-03-08_ Crispin Glover * What it is? + The Big Problem (dou pack)
22-02-08_ Christina Ricci * Penelope
24-03-08_ Nobuo Takahashi: Godzilla, al revés
24-03-08_ CREENCIA Y PENSAMIENTO * ética y práctica del cine en la filosofía de Gilles Deleuze
02-03-08_ I'm fucking Matt Damon
24-03-08_ De la verosimilitud a la autenticidad * Atonement, un caso práctico
12-01-08_ BE KIND REWIND
19-12-07_ BitTorrent, A Boom To Independent Filmmakers
26-12-07_ Groupe MEDVEDKINE
02-12-07_ Ernie Gehr y el cine sin argumento
02-12-07_ Documental y Ficción, Masculino/Femenino
11-12-07_ El cinematógrafo como forma artística
30-11-07_ Chris Marker * Ensayo Fílmico ;-)
09-12-07_ Promesas del Este...
24-11-07_Still Life
16-11-07_ The five obstructions
01-01-08_ Montaje del desastre
26-09-07_ Por qué nos gusta tanto "El hombre de los ojos de Rayos X"
10-10-07_ Entrevista * Gyorgy Lukacs (va de cine)
16-09-07_ Entrevista* Orson Wells
25-09-07_Caotica Ana y la cosmogonia
25-09-07_Last minute
11-09-07_ Naomi Klein y Alfonso Cuaron
25-08-07_ Removiendo turbias raices con agua de primavera
10-05-08_ Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex, Drugs and Rock 'N' Roll Generation Saved Hollywood
04-08-07_ "Euphoria", una historia sobre el amor brutal
03-08-07_ 28 osstias te daba yo
25-08-07_ The Pirate Bay Launches Bergmanbits, A Tribute to Ingmar Bergman
05-08-07_ Avant-Garde: Experimental Cinema of the 1920s and '30s
31-07-07_ Después de todo
23-07-07_ Raymond Salvatore Harmon: Secrets & Light
31-07-07_ Lo has visto ya todo, no hay nada más que ver ...
06-07-07_ Beat Takeshi, generación beat, no me digas nada -Takeshi's, Last Days, Carlos Pazos
26-06-07_ X men
26-06-07_ Wanderlust
29-05-07_ The evolution of snuff
23-04-08_ Fay Grim * Hal Hartley
30-05-07_ Shorts and Hal Hartley Interview
26-06-07_ Maya Deren * The complete films
26-08-07_ INLAND EMPIRE * El desierto de lo imaginario
01-01-08_ Two short films by David Lynch
30-03-07_ Grandes diálogos: Marathon Man
30-03-07_ La vida de los otros
30-03-07_ Soviet/Russian Parallel Cinema
09-04-07_ Sátántángo * Bela Tarr
18-03-07_ The fountain * Darren Aronofsky (2006)
14-03-07_ David Cronenberg and the cinema of the extreme (1997)
22-02-07_ The End * Christopher Mclaine
01-08-07_ Clint Talks
08-07-07_¿Qué es el acto de creación? * Gilles Deleuze 
16-02-07_ Akira Kurosawa * Rashomon
09-07-07_ Entrevista * Takeshi Kitano (BEAT TAkeshi)
11-02-07_ Frente a un diluvio de películas. Redescubrir a Kracauer
06-02-07_ Factory Blah
31-05-07_ Jean-Luc Godard por JLG
07-02-07_  Por un cine de exposición * Jean-Christophe Royoux
27-04-08_ Primer * The movie... [actualizado 25_03_08]

25-01-07_ This film is not yet rated
23-01-07_ Mishima: Yukoku - Rite of Love & Death
16-01-07_ NYSUFILMS
30-08-07_ Performance * the movie
08-01-07_ A propósito de "Volver"
07-01-07_ A Pack of Apocalypse. When? Now.
03-01-07_Introduction to "Avant-Garde Film"
03-01-07_ The Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things
16-01-08_ Skidoo: Otto Preminger's Unreleased Classic
25-12-06_ Orson Welles: The one-man band
22-12-06_ Plan 9 From Outer Space * Ed Wood
22-12-06_ A Scanner Darkly * PKD
22-12-06_ F is for Fake + Almost true
20-12-06_ Searching for the wrong-eyed Jesus
20-12-06_ Los "vacíos" de Antonioni
10-12-06_ Tarnation * Subjetividades renovadas
24-11-06_ Devenir secular de la simultaneidad en el cine
28-11-06_ Iraq for sale, la nueva película de Robert Greenwald
14-11-06_ Nobody wants your film
01-11-06_A PSA on Piracy
26-10-06_Pequeña Miss Sunshine
22-10-06_Werner Schroeter * The Death of Maria Malibran
22-10-06_Sherlock Holmes y la mujer araña
26-10-06_A Scanner Darkly ****
18-10-06_Temporada de patos
17-10-06_Toshio Matsumoto * Experimental Film Works
08-10-06_Forbidden Zone
08-10-06_Old Joy * Kelly Reichardt
29-09-06_El momento de volver a partir
08-10-06_The Devil and Daniel Johnston
29-09-06_Cine por el morro en Barcelona
28-09-06_The Queen: an elegiac prophecy
19-09-06_Le Grand Bouffe 1973
19-09-06_La Dalia Negra Review: cagada y consenso
17-09-06_Lenny Bruce * Thank You, Mask Man
16-09-06_Paris forever and ever
13-09-06_Film as a Subversive Art: Amos Vogel and Cinema 16
11-09-06_The Cowboy and the Frenchman * David Lynch
08-09-06_If Footmen Tire You, What Will Horses Do?
16-09-06_Man Bites Dog director dies at 38
05-09-06_Spectres & Tribulation
05-09-06_The Fountain * Darren Aronofsky * Venecia
30-08-06_Spike lee * When The Levees Broke
03-09-06_Steal This Film
05-09-06_El coro que llevamos en la cabeza
27-09-09_ Legendary Epics Yarns and Fables: Stan Brakhage
16-04-08_ The Pervert's Guide To Cinema  [actualizado 25_03_08]
13-08-06_dotsub and IMPD
06-08-06_John Huston, el hombre que no quiso reinar
04-08-06_Going C.R.A.Z.Y.
28-07-06_‘Scoop’: Shades of Nick and Nora, With Woody Allen’s Shtick
22-07-06_I See Good Movies
01-07-06_El señor de la guerra
30-06-06_The Viagra Auteurs
28-06-06_Andy Warhol * A documentary by Kim Evans
28-06-06_The Films of Jack Goldstein
14-10-07_ Cinema of Transgression
08-06-06_The Net
07-06-06_Lev Manovich * What is Digital Cinema?
04-06-06_Michael Snow * Wavelength
05-06-06_Robert Rauschenberg * Linoleum
05-06-06_ Robert Morris & Stan VanDerBeek
05-06-06_ Gene Youngblood * Expanded Cinema
05-06-06_William S. Burroughs * The Cut-Ups
13-04-08_ The Weather Underground [updated 25_03_'08]
05-06-06_Francis Ford Coppola * The Junky’s Christmas
06-06-06_Alfred Leslie * The Last Clean Shirt
17-05-06_¿Por qué querrá Sam la cabeza de Al?
15-05-06_Agnes Varda: Black Panthers - Huey!
06-06-06_Alternative 3
04-08-06_Rosellini a los 100 * Decálogo de un insurrecto
04-05-06_El amor en los tiempos venideros * Codigo 46
04-05-06_Art is for pussies
21-04-06_A User's Guide to the TriBeCa Film Festival
02-04-06_Kim Ki-duk * El arco
29-03-06_The worst of the worst: 10 bottom films of 2005
27-03-06_A Filmmaking Robot
29-03-06_Horror Show
24-03-06_Young. Beautiful. Deadly revisited
20-03-06_Matthew Barney | The Cremaster Cycle
17-03-06_Thank you for Smoking
19-03-06_Anarchy in the U.K.
08-03-06_Pequeños consejos para cortometrajistas
07-03-06_Cine de ciencia ficción
06-03-06_Entrevista | Jeanne Moreau Actriz [EXP]
05-03-06_Mondovino * Agitación necesaria
05-03-06_Bush da nueva vida al cine político * Siriana
24-02-06_Transamérica / Amor de p/madre
18-02-06_La Mayor pelicula irlandesa: Film, de Samuel Beckett
07-02-06_El miedo al mono en v.o.
07-02-06_James Mangold
05-02-06_Lee Tamahori detenido por prostitución
03-02-06_Philip Seymour Hoffman
29-01-06_Sundance premia 'La ruta natural'
29-01-06_Lírica visual / UNSEEN CINEMA
23-01-06_Borrascas personales
20-01-06_Whither the DIY Auteurs of DV?
17-01-06_Goons of New York
16-01-06_El club de las olas
13-01-06_El lado oscuro de la épica
11-01-06_Coke Classic
11-01-06_La muerte, probablemente
09-01-06_Jon Stewart, Oscar Host
08-01-06_I Like to Watch
06-01-06_Brokeback Mountain
23-12-05_A Revenger's Odyssey in Pursuit of Terrorists
12-12-05_Variety 100 años / 100 iconos del cine
06-12-05_Thinking Outside the Box Office / interview with Steven Soderbergh
03-12-05_ Flores Rotas: «Introducing» Ramón, El gato del milenio
01-12-05_Primer » Shane Carruth
08-06-05_Victor Erice » El sol del membrillo
06-06-05_Ivan Zulueta » Arrebato
06-06-05_Ridley Scott » El reino de los cielos (Vaya cruz)



Regístrate y disfruta de utilidades de administración y gestión de los contenidos de e-limbo*
Recibe las novedades en tu correo electronico.
El futuro está escrito en las estrellas... Horóscopo creado por J.G. Ballard y dedicado a todos vosotros.
Aplicaciones y herramientas necesarias para navegar y utilizar los contenidos del limbo electrónico e internet (www).
Artículos de e-limbo* en formato PDF preparados para viajar y aportar información allá donde estés. (y seguir salvando árboles)

_e-limbo * apoya



Mais uma edição do podcast Música Livre para o Archivo Vivo, do Centro Cultural da Espanha/AECID. ...
Ante preguntas de oyentes y amigos, puedo responder ahora que Vía Límite continuará en Radio ...
SORPRESA¡!¡! An unreleased version of Talking Heads' "Psycho Killer" with Arthur Russell on cello
Optimizado: Firefox, Safari, Mozilla, Netscape, Konqueror, Explorer. Resolución óptima: 1024x768
ISSN: 1885-5229    Aviso Legal e-limbo.org*